We analyze which of your web content is at risk from AI summaries (AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity) and what's technically missing for you to be cited as a source. Prioritized plan, no fluff.
- Audit of which pages are losing traffic to AI summaries (zero-click)
- Technical review: schema, authorship, llms.txt and AI crawler accessibility
- Map of what content to protect, rewrite or drop
- Plan prioritized by impact, not a generic checklist
- Implementation of the technical fixes if you need it
- Tracking whether you start showing up cited in AI answers
Is this for you?
Organic traffic dropping with no changes on your end, and you suspect it's AI summaries in search.
Content built for Google 2020 only: no schema, no visible authorship, no llms.txt.
Blog, guides or resources where it's worth knowing if the effort of writing still pays off.
What to expect
The process, step by step
We review schema, robots.txt, llms.txt and which content has already lost traffic based on the data you have available.
We classify each page: which ones are at high risk of losing clicks to AI, which ones are already protected.
What to protect first, what to rewrite, what schema to add — ordered by impact, not volume.
We roll out the technical fixes ourselves if you'd rather not have your team build it.
We measure whether you start showing up cited in AI answers, not just in traditional rankings.
Frequently asked questions
No, it complements it. Classic SEO still matters for transactional searches; the GEO audit covers what traditional SEO doesn't measure: whether you're cited in AI answers.
We cross-reference each page's query type with known patterns of what questions Google answers directly in the summary, with no click needed.
No. The technical fixes (schema, llms.txt, authorship) apply to whatever site you already have, regardless of platform.
Yes. The plan is documented so your team or ours can execute it, whichever you prefer.